Feb 8, 2021 01:31
Ytlaya posted:
I think that this aspect is a bit less of an ethical dilemma because the alternative if they don't win the war (and this is only being proposed because they feel it's necessary to do so) is "Yeerks are still inside their head, but they have zero freedom, as opposed to the sort of mix of freedom and insane episodes that the oatmeal causes." It's not really making things any worse for the humans unless the alternate is a full victory (and they wouldn't be doing this in the first place if they knew how to achieve that alternative).
What they're doing to the Yeerks, on the other hand, is a sort of life-long torture. The situation is complicated a bit by the fact that the Yeerks themselves also mass torture their hosts, but it's definitely still a war crime they're proposing.
I suppose, but I would think that they'd naturally be more concerned about humans than Yeerks. And the general line of thinking so far has been that if they can win the war they can free the slaves, that that beacon of hope is always there; in fact Jake's Civil War analogy would be more accurate if, like, the North could have won the war by permanently maiming a lot of the slaves. An ugly yet ultimately acceptable deal in the long run, but... maybe not worth doing unless you definitely think you're going to lose otherwise? More of a tactical cost/benefit analysis than a purely moral choice.
Also, I like that (as in many discussions that verge on making the hard choice) Rachel and Marco find themselves allies.
Also (end of series spoilers!) there must be thousands or even tens of thousands of Controllers in California at this point, and post-war that would be so... weird! Like being a Holocaust survivor. I don't know why that never occurred to me before; that even though the Animorphs are fighting this secret war that only comes out in the open later on, there are also thousands of other people with direct experience of it.